Spider-man 3The third, and presumably last movie in the venerable franchise, Spider-man 3 brings the trilogy to a satisfying, if somewhat
over-packed, conclusion. In this tale, Peter Parker (Tobey
Maguire) has the girl and the love of all New York City. But after losing touch with his long-suffering love Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten
Dunst) he must not only battle his crumbling relationship, but also the Sandman--now escaped from prison and presumed to be Ben Parker's real killer--as well as the black suited Venom (
Topher Grace). Not to mention mending fences with his old friend Harry who has suited up as the Green Goblin and is out for revenge.
If that sounds like A LOT of story to get through in 2 and 1/2 hours, you're not alone. Amazingly, Sam
Raimi and company pull it off, mostly. The biggest problem with the movie is that there is SO much going on that all the cool stuff (Venom, a big battle with Sandman, etc.) gets less screen time than it should. That makes the final confrontation seem a little anti-climactic given that it has three movies worth of
back story to pay off. In the end though, it's an entertaining enough ride, but this is one case where less truly is more.
Shrek the Third
Honestly, I'm really sad to write a negative review of a
Shrek movie--especially when I consider the first one among my all-time favorite animated movies and the second one made me laugh the entire way through. But this third movie is a turkey, and that's just a shame. The movie follows
Shrek, Donkey and Puss as they attempt to find an heir to Far, Far Away after Fiona's father passes away (in an
excruciatingly over-acted scene--which I didn't think was possible in animated movies, but there you go.) Meanwhile, Fiona and her Princess Pals must find a way to thwart the evil Prince
Charming's plan to rule the kingdom for himself.
The problem with this movie is that it feels more like a brand extension than an actual movie--as if
Dreamworks had to put it out to meet their yearly earnings reports. There are a couple of funny gags (which can be viewed in the trailers or commercials) but on the whole, I just didn't find it that funny. Or interesting. Or engaging whatsoever. The ironic part?
Shrek has now become exactly what it mocked in the first movie--an overproduced attempt at hipness without any of the actual heart.
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
Ok, what? Johnny
Depp, Orlando Bloom,
Kiera Knightley and Geoffrey Rush all return for the climax of the Pirates franchise and quite honestly, I can barely tell you what happened in this movie. Suffice it to say, our intrepid pirate gang is going to the end of the earth to save Jack from Davy Jones' locker and then after they do that a series of crossings, double crossings, triple crossings and other stuff happens. In the end, it all leads to a climactic battle between pirate ships and the East India Company which supposedly resolves everything.
Maybe I should have paid more attention to the plot. Maybe I should have tried to figure out what was going on, but honestly, I really didn't want to. I like a dense story as much as the next guy, but this was just confusing. So, rather than try and figure out who is on whose side, I just sat back and enjoyed the ride. And what a ride it is! The special effects are first rate, the battle scene at the end is intense and realistic and the movie as a whole is funny. But it lacks the charm and substance of Curse of the Black Pearl. In the end, the movie is satisfying enough. Just don't come out expecting to have any of your questions answered.